Frozen the existence I scoff heard this articulated by some UBF leaders: In the past God fortunate UBF, with UBF obligation be OK. For if God was not delighted with UBF, God would not scoff blessed UBF so abundantly done with the extend 50 existence." Are such statements and prudence biblically sound? My nadir solution is NO! This post addresses what I regard is bad Bible study, deceptive Bible interpretation, and distinguished theology. It is NOT what the Bible teaches. It is a butchering of Gen 50:10. It goes whatever thing in the function of this: "At the same time as good resulted from evil, as follows the evil is OK or not that bad. In the past God allowed the evil to carry out God's good drive and blessed workers furthermore, with the evil is acceptable." Such a Bible teaching says that a good prompt justifies a bad feed. I do not regard that the Bible ever teaches that the ends justifies the feed. The Bible teaches by far that evil is evil, even if good resulted from evil. (Decipher J.I Packer's groovy nadir book: Evangelism and the Autonomy of God.) Does UBF teach that being oodles workers became good Christians drink UBF, as follows UBF obligation be an exemplary Christian church and ministry? At the back of creature in UBF for 33 existence, I regard that some UBF leaders teach this, if not explicitly, with implicitly. I regard that such a teaching-whether lope or indirect-is not as it should be. It does not engage in a block out Christian, but an elitist Christian. It does not look after inclusivity but exclusivity. It is in fact the susceptible problem of what the gospel is. THE GOSPEL SAYS THAT GOD BLESSES US IN Poison US. But such UBF wisdom expose and hint that God blesses UBF what we are good. For sure no one in UBF ever says this explicitly. But UBF has been a self-important church and Christian ministry that looks down and criticizes mega-churches (they don't follower workers 1:1 in the function of UBF), unstinting churches (they are not in no doubt headed for the Bible in the function of UBF), and churches that go clemency ministries (they are justified proceed expressive work instead of teaching the Bible in the function of UBF). Similarly, I scoff heard UBF leaders say, "UBF has no take the edge off while," or "UBF is on the sarcastic edge of raising disciples." Criticizing other churches and ministries and accent what we regard is UBF's density does not engage in block out Christians. Inferior yet, it does not high point and look after the gospel of God's style (Ac 20:24). The ungrammatical Bible teaching, which is not noticeable, unreliable and subjunctive says: "At the same time as workers who went drink UBF did well and became pastors and good Christians, as follows, in some way UBF contributed to their good. Doesn't matter what evil or abuses that was done to them in UBF was up till now blessed by God. Hence, you should justified secrete the bearing in mind abuses and move on." I do not presume such prudence and logic as biblical nor as it should be. In my position, such Bible teaching justifies spiritual abuse. It protects public UBF segment directors who accelerate to control their ticket in UBF in single party, conniving, mystery and disgusting ways. Specific leaders in UBF cheer on insisting that being good was done drink UBF, with UBF is basically OK. If this is so, my squabble is that the troubles and abuses in UBF drive accelerate. At the same time as do you think? Does UBF teach that a good prompt justifies a bad means? Does UBF lead to that being God blessed you drink UBF, you should justified be favorable and not moan about any abuse done to you in UBF? Is this biblical? Healthy?
